The best gaming laptops of 2017 – we sum up and make forecasts / Laptops and PCs

It is difficult to unequivocally answer, what happened in 2017 in the market of gaming laptops. On the one hand, Intel and NVIDIA did not provide a new hardware that would significantly increase the performance of mobile devices. As in 2016, the best solutions are the quad-core Kaby Lake processors and the GeForce GTX 1080 graphics. On the other hand, there are models on the market that, in my opinion, marked the beginning of a new era – an era when really powerful gaming laptops finally came to life, then ceased to be unbearable "coffins."

# Who is the most powerful in the world

Notebook graphics NVIDIA Pascal appeared in 2016, and it was a real revolution! For the first time, laptops were almost equal in performance in games with desktop computers. Against the backdrop of the mobile GPU generation Maxwell, the new graphics of the "green" has become noticeably more productive. Thus, NVIDIA's flagship GeForce GTX 1080 is on average twice as fast as the GeForce GTX 980M.

In 2017, the line of gaming GPU Pascal was formed finally. At the time of writing, notebooks with eight versions of graphics accelerators were on sale: GeForce GTX 1050, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and 6 GB, GeForce GTX 1070 (standard and Max-Q design), GeForce GTX 1080 conventional and in Max-Q design).

Unfortunately, NVIDIA in 2017 did not submit a mobile version of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, and therefore the most productive portable systems are still equipped with two video cards. I think the notebook version of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is unlikely to be born, because now NVIDIA is actively developing game solutions based on the Volta architecture. The graphs below show the results of most models in Full HD resolution.

As you can see, even notebooks with graphics level GeForce GTX 1050 can be called gaming, because the performance of this GPU is enough for modern games on average graphics quality settings . And certainly such models will cope with popular multiplayer games such as CS: GO, Dota 2, League of Legends and StarCraft II.

Optimum performance, in my opinion, has laptops equipped with mobile versions of GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) and GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB). Owners of such models can be absolutely calm: in 2018 they will be able to comfortably play all the novelties on high and very high settings of the quality of graphics.

But even in 2017 there was not much point in buying a gaming laptop with a 4K-screen. Firstly, on 15- and 17-inch screens, there is not much difference in the quality of the image. Secondly, even a couple of powerful GPUs in most cases are not able to provide a comfortable FPS with maximum graphics quality settings. So Full HD is still considered the best option for a gaming laptop. If you want to spend a little more money – it's better to buy a model with IPS-matrix .

Since I started talking about the optimal combinations of the components of a gaming laptop, it's necessary to note that any model in 2018 will not exactly interfere with 16 GB of RAM. Our experiment showed that using only 8 GB in the system can lead to lag during the game under certain circumstances, as many modern projects require more than 8 GB of RAM for high graphics quality settings. Data that does not fit into the video memory is written to the system memory cells of the laptop. And already with a lack of RAM, a swap file is used – it is used to store virtual memory pages. Using a swap file on the hard disk will result in noticeable FPS drawdowns. The game will be uncomfortable, although the average number of frames per second, shown in a particular game, can be quite acceptable.

In fact, many aspects of the choice of a gaming laptop are considered in this article . The guide will be relevant exactly until the moment when Intel and NVIDIA (and, possibly, AMD) will not present the new components and thus will not raise the performance of laptops by one more step.

In 2017, NVIDIA introduced another mobile GPU – GeForce MX150. In fact, this is an analogue of the GP108, which is used in the discrete GeForce GT 1030 graphics card. For modern games, even at medium settings such graphics will not work, but with multiuser undemanding projects it will easily cope – the GeForce GT 1030 is coping .

# Getting lost in the three pines

If over the choice of laptop graphics will have to properly break his head, then this can not be said about the choice of the CPU. In 2017, the user was available, in fact, only models of laptops with quad-core "stones" Core i5-7300HQ, Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-7820HK. That's the whole choice. Test results clearly demonstrate the enormous difference in performance between Core i5 and Core i7. Therefore, if you need a laptop not only for games, but also for working in resource-intensive programs, that is, the reason to purchase a model with an older version of the CPU.

But the "choice" is too much said, since many gaming laptops are equipped with only one particular CPU model. Variability – the choice between Core i5-7300HQ and Core i7-7700HQ – is only observed in inexpensive models. So, in notebooks with graphics level GeForce GTX 1070 and higher in the vast majority of cases installed Core i7-7700HQ. The Core i7-7820HK processor is used mainly in very expensive models with a price of 200,000 rubles. This CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and on some laptops it can be overclocked to 4-4.5 GHz.

In general, Core i7-7820HK is not the most productive (without overclocking) laptop Kaby Lake. The fastest is the quad-core model Core i7-7920HQ, whose frequency in multi-threaded applications from the base 3.1 GHz is increased to 3.7 GHz. Only this chip is used in just a couple of models from MSI.

And some companies do not hesitate to use desktop CPUs in super-expensive models – the same Core i7-7700K, for example. True, in Russia, such laptops are considered to be the most curious.

As a result, the choice of CPU in the gaming laptop is relevant only for models with graphics level GeForce GTX 1060 and below. And here everything is quite simple: in the reviews, I pointed out that the performance of the Core i5-7300HQ is sufficient for revealing the potential of the budget graphics of NVIDIA Pascal. For example, the chart above compares notebooks Acer (with Core i5-7300HQ) and ASUS (with Core i7-7700HQ). In these laptops the same GPU is installed, and therefore the devices demonstrate similar results in games in Full HD resolution.

In early 2017, Intel introduced the desktop processors Pentium generation Kaby Lake. These chips have been supported by Hyper-Threading technology, and they are quite suitable for use in inexpensive gaming computers. Honestly: I was hoping that Intel would also release a laptop version of this processor. Laptops with a 4-stream Pentium and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics would perfectly show themselves in modern games. And they would have cost much less. Now, a laptop with a Core i5-7300HQ processor and a 4-gigabyte version of the GeForce GTX 1050 costs at the most 50 thousand rubles.

Therefore, let's note one of the main results of 2017: in the market of gaming laptops there is no competition therefore, Intel and NVIDIA do not make sense to go to a meeting with buyers. It remains to be hoped that 2018 in this plan will be a turning point. Nevertheless, the AMD Ryzen processors have potential.

# See the AMD gamblers? No? And they are!

On the potential of notebooks with AMD Ryzen in 2017, we could judge by model ASUS ROG Strix GL702ZC . The Taiwanese company has put on sale modifications with full-fledged desktop chips Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 7 1700, the TDP level of which is 65 watts. At the same time for FPS in games in these laptops is responsible for mobile version of Radeon RX 580 with 4 GB of video memory.

Intel Core i5-7300HQ (Dell Inspiron 7567-9309) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE) Intel Core i7-7820HK (MSI GT73VR 7RE Titan SLI) Intel Core i7-7820HK @ 4.3-4.5 GHz (MSI GT73VR 7RE Titan SLI) AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (ASUS ROG Strix GL702ZC) Productivity increase in comparison with Core i7-7820HK,%
Corona 1.3, with (less is better) 491 275 267 225 196 27
WinRAR 5.40, with (less is better) 793 516 442 380 500 -13
Blender 2.76, with (less is better) 500 314 304 276 262 14
x265 HD Benchmark, FPS (more is better) 12 15.9 16.4 17.9 20.1 23
CINEBENCH R15, points (more is better) 510 741 768 920 1128 47

It turns out that the ROG Strix GL702ZC with the eight-core Ryzen 7 1700 is the notebook with the most powerful CPU at the moment. Therefore, the model from ASUS will suit first of all those who wish to get a powerful mobile workstation at their disposal.

Nevertheless, the ROG Strix GL702ZC is positioned by the manufacturer as a gaming laptop. That's only the mobile version of Radeon RX 580 in most games inferior to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB – too much engineers ASUS "cut" the frequency of the GPU. In addition, the graphics processor is equipped with only 4 GB of video memory. Personally, I would be interested to see how the same Ryzen 5 1600 would have got along with the GeForce GTX 1070.

Given that the ROG Strix GL702ZC costs significantly more analogs based on the processor Core i5-7300HQ and GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, the chances of success for the model is not very much. Alas, but one in the field – not a warrior.

# The Battle of Two Extremes

In 2017, industry leaders continued to produce monstrous gaming laptops costing between 200 and 700 thousand rubles. Updated series such as MSI GT83VR and ASUS ROG GX . These laptops use the most productive components. So, in the models listed there is a pair of GeForce GTX 1080 – this is the most productive bundle of GPUs in laptops to date. They weigh more than 5 kg, and it is unlikely that you will find a backpack of the appropriate size for sale, in which this miracle of technology will fit without any tweaks. The same ASUS ROG GX is sold with a suitcase on wheels, because the external liquid cooling system is included with the laptop. The thickness of the MSI GT83VR is 69 mm – some desktop gaming computers are thinner .

The funny thing is that these same manufacturers in 2017 released very powerful, but at the same time, compact and light notebooks. With the direct support of NVIDIA, the companies finally managed to fit in a case with a thickness of 18-20 mm graphics level GeForce GTX 1080.

 Acer Predator Triton 700 "height =" 267 "width =" 400 "/> </a></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
<p> In 2017 Acer was particularly distinguished. So, on our site there were reviews of flagship models <a href= Predator 21 X and Triton 700 . The first laptop is a "monster" with a 21-inch curved display, two GeForce GTX 1080, a thickness of 83 mm and a mass of 8 kg. And the thickness of the Triton 700 is only 19 mm with a weight of 2.4 kg. At the same time, a mobile version of the GeForce GTX 1080 in the Max-Q design is installed in the 15.6-inch notebook. So, we saw absolutely different approaches to creating gaming laptops from one manufacturer. If the Predator 21 X tries to be as much as possible on super-productive desktops, then Triton 700, on the contrary, can not be distinguished from the ultrabook. Both models are great for games, and therefore a reasonable question arises: what will the super-productive gamer laptops of the future be like?

 Acer Predator 21 X "height =" 514 "width =" 800 "/> </a></p>
</div>
<p> Acer Predator 21 X is definitely the most unusual gaming product that has been in the 3DNews test lab. The device was introduced in 2016 at the IFA exhibition in Berlin, but appeared on sale in Russia only a year later. A total of 300 copies of Predator 21X have been issued. Most of them have already been sold. The basic wow-effect of this model, of course, creates its cost – 700 000 rubles. Three quarters of a million! In this case, the main chip of the "Predator" is a 21-inch concave screen with a 21: 9 aspect ratio. In other respects, the laptop has a set of iron typical for super-expensive models. Well, do not surprise us in 2017 with a Core i7-7820HK processor and two mobile GeForce GTX 1080. </p>
<p> I understand perfectly why ASUS, Acer and MSI produce such laptops. When it comes to the device for 300-700 thousand rubles, you know: the manufacturer simply increases the recognition of your own brand. </p>
<h2 class= # The long-awaited evolution

In my opinion, laptops should remain laptops. Attempts to catch up and overtake desktop PCs, on the one hand, are commendable. Only the goal is achieved by too many compromises. I believe that gaming laptops of the future should be equal to such models as ASUS ROG ZEPHYRUS (GX501) and Acer Predator Triton 700 .

The emergence of productive mobile graphics in the design of Max-Q is the main event of the year . Max-Q is the joint creativity of NVIDIA and notebook manufacturers. For more than a year the technology of crystal production has been sharpened, and now the "flagship" offered their partners the flagship GPU (GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 1080) with a seriously reduced TDP level. Strictly speaking, this is the idea of ​​Max-Q: NVIDIA provided the selected chips and software (GeForce Experience with optimization for more than 400 games), and laptop manufacturers have developed the design of the chassis, motherboard and cooling system, so that at a thickness of not more than 19 mm all components are not overheated and not much noise. In addition to ASUS and Acer, similar laptops released Clevo and MSI.

Graphics in Max-Q design is the long-awaited evolution of mobile GPUs. Therefore, the models ASUS ROG ZEPHYRUS (GX501) and Acer Predator Triton 700 are the best notebooks of the year 2017 . Light, compact, but very powerful – this is how modern gaming machines should be. If you do not agree with me, I will be only glad to get acquainted with the alternative opinion in the comments to this article.

 Acer Predator Triton 700 "height =" 534 "width =" 800 "/> </a></p>
</div>
<p> At the same time, there is no need to idealize laptops with Max-Q graphics, they have shortcomings. Both ASUS ROG ZEPHYRUS (GX501) and Acer Predator Triton 700 work quite loudly, and NVIDIA claimed that these models have some of the best acoustic characteristics with a maximum noise level of 40 dB. In justification, I will say that in 2017 there was not a single quiet gaming laptop on sale. Unfortunately, these laptops are not designed to work on the built-in battery, and this is somewhat frustrating, since thin laptops, in my opinion, are just developing to increase their mobility. Finally, models with Max-Q graphics are unreasonably expensive. </p>
<p> I want to believe that soon the manufacturers will fix the listed shortcomings, and with the growth of popularity such devices will only become more accessible. </p>
<p><center/> </p>
<p class= # Conclusion

Когда в 2016 году NVIDIA представила мобильные версии GeForce GTX 1070 и GeForce GTX 1080, которые практически ни в чем не уступают аналогам, используемым в настольных ПК, — это была самая настоящая революция, так как впервые в истории ноутбучная графика встала на одну ступеньку с десктопной. В 2017 году мы наблюдали уже за эволюцией игровой графики в ноутбуках: впервые лэптопы толщиной всего 18-20 мм снабдили такими мощным GPU, как GeForce GTX 1070 и GeForce GTX 1080. Но что нас ждет в 2018 году?

Хочется верить, что в новом году будет возрождена конкуренция на рынке мобильных компьютеров. Тестирование ROG Strix GL702ZC показало, что у процессоров поколения Ryzen есть все шансы закрепиться в игровых ноутбуках. Хочется разнообразия и вариативности при выборе той или иной модели. В то же время ждем от Intel выпуска шестиядерных процессоров Coffee Lake, а от NVIDIA — мощную графику на базе архитектуры Volta. Уверен, что мобильные аналоги мало в чем будут уступать железу, используемому в десктопах. В общем, в этом году должно случиться много всего интересного.

Предположу, что даже в 2018 году в игровых ноутбуках в основном будут использоваться экраны с разрешением Full HD. Это оптимальный вариант для 15- и 17-дюймовых устройств. Обладатели лэптопов с графикой уровня GeForce GTX 1060 и выше могут быть спокойны — в этом году вы сможете спокойно поиграть в любую современную игру. А вот производительности таких GPU, как GeForce GTX 1050 Ti и GeForce GTX 1050, уже недостаточно. Учитывайте этот момент при выборе той или иной модели.

Если вы заметили ошибку — выделите ее мышью и нажмите CTRL+ENTER.

Leave a Reply